Home
Anthony P. Facchini, Esq.
Richard A. Facchini, Jr, Esq.
Michael D. Facchini, Esq.
Robert J. Rzeszutek, Esq.
Significant Cases
Contact Us
Specializing In:

 

» Serious Injuries
» Car Accidents
» Personal Injury
» Work Place Injury
» Medical Negligence
» Defective Products
» Criminal Defense
» Wills & Estate Planning
» Real Estate Closing
Look for us in the phonebook
 

SIGNIFICANT CASES


< Previous | Next >


Title: Two Young Mothers Severely Burned in Home Containing Only One Inoperable Fire Detector
Type of Action: Negligence & Tort, Strict Liability and G.L. c. 93A
Injuries Alleged: Severe Burns, Permanent Scarring and Psychological Issues
Name of Case: Witheld
Court/Case No: Witheld
Tried Before Judge or Jury: N/A (Settled)
Special Damages:
Mother #1: $49,694.92 (Medical)
Mother #2: $11,130.39 (Medical)
Amount of Settlement: $450,000.00
Date: 03/18/08
Law Firm: Facchini & Facchini, P.C.
Attorneys: Richard A. Facchini, Esq.
Anthony P. Facchini, Esq.
Michael D. Facchini, Esq.
Summary

      There was a structure fire that occurred in the early morning hours of Monday, August 2, 2004 at a two family house where two families were living as tenants. The premises contained only one inoperable smoke detector. It was located on the first floor near the front door and the hallway adjoining the kitchen. There were no fire detectors on the second or third (attic) floors. At no time during the two families tenancy did the owners of the property test or otherwise maintain the sole fire detector.

      On the previous Friday (on or about July 30, 2004), the premises was the subject of a home invasion in which two men entered the premises and attempted to steal anything of value. A vehicle parked outside the premises as the home was vandalized. The men warned the families residing at the home that they would return. As a result of this event, the residents were fearful of sleeping on the first floor of the premises; therefore, they slept on the second and third (attic) floors. They posted sentries from among their number to keep watch.

      At approximately 1:00 a.m. one of the older children, who was posted as a lookout, observed two individuals running down the street and then saw that the porch area of the first floor was engulfed in flames. As most of the other residents were asleep, he scrambled to awaken everyone. As he did, the single smoke detector on the first floor reportedly remained silent.

      The fire quickly spread. Two of the children were able to escape through the kitchen exit on the first floor. As the rest of the residents were descending the stairs, the flames rapidly swept up the stairway cutting off any hope of easy escape. The residents retreated back up to the second floor. One of the mothers, who was pregnant at the time, jumped out of a side window on the second floor. The remainder of the residents were forced of leap from the second story balcony. The premises was subsequently consumed in flames and was later condemned as a total loss.

      Several of the residents including the two mothers sustained serious injuries including severe burns and permanent scarring over large areas of their bodies (one of the mothers incurred severe burns covering approximately 12 to 15% of her body), requiring extensive physical and psychological treatment.

      The two young mothers experienced the nightmarish trauma of the fire, sustained vicious burns, endured extensive medical treatment, and are now saddled with grotesque and permanent scarring which brutally marred their physical appearance and adversely effects their psychological and emotional well being. They also continue to suffer from chronic pain, soreness and limited movement from their injuries.

      Negotiations were difficult given the defense issues presented including whether the owner/landlord was responsible for the resulting injuries sustained in the fire caused by third party tortfeasors (alleged superseding intervening cause), and whether the subject property was in accordance with the Commonwealth’s Building Code when the two mothers were claiming there was only one allegedly inoperable smoke detector on the first floor and the owner/landlord, who was denying this fact, had an approximately eight year old certificate stating the property was up to code.

      The case settled for $450,000.00 after mediation despite the liability issues and having had no prior offers of settlement.

All rights reserved.